Scopus

Using explainable AI to diagnose institutional inequality in student dropout across ethnic and regional groups in Vietnam

Năm XB 2026 Tạp chí / Hội thảo AI and Society DOI / Link https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-026-03054-1 ↗

Tác giả

Trung-Nghia Phung ✉

Tóm tắt

Student dropout remains a critical challenge for higher education systems in socially and economically diverse regions. While artificial intelligence is increasingly used to predict dropout risk, limited attention has been paid to whether such systems reproduce or obscure underlying social inequities. This study proposes a counterfactual explainable AI framework to examine how ethnic and regional inequalities are encoded in predictive models of student dropout. Using longitudinal administrative data from a regional university in Vietnam’s Northern Midlands and Mountainous Area, the analysis evaluates three dimensions of algorithmic inequity: group-level risk disparities, under-identification of at-risk students, and counterfactual effort required to reduce predicted dropout risk below the model-defined intervention threshold. Results show that students from rural and ethnic minority backgrounds face higher predicted dropout risk, are less likely to be flagged by early-warning systems, and require systematically greater counterfactual effort to achieve comparable risk reductions. By interpreting counterfactual effort as a proxy for institutional burden, the study illustrates how explainable AI can function as a tool for social diagnosis rather than mere prediction. The findings highlight the importance of integrating explainability and fairness analysis to inform equity-oriented educational policy. Although situated in a Vietnamese context, this study does not claim direct empirical generalization to other higher education systems. The proposed framework is conceptually transferable to settings facing structural inequality, while the magnitude and patterns of disparity documented here should be interpreted as context-dependent.

Từ khoá

Explainable artificial intelligence Counterfactual analysis Educational inequality Student dropout Higher education in Asia Ethnic and regional disparities

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] ASEAN Secretariat. (2022) The State of Higher Education in Southeast Asia. ASEAN regional report, Jakarta. https://asean.org/book/the-state-of-higher-education-in-southeast-asia/

[2] Bean JP, Metzner BS (1985) A Conceptual Model of Nontraditional Undergraduate Student Attrition. Rev Educ Res 55(4):485–540. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543055004485

[3] Bourdieu P, Passeron J-C, Nice R (1977) Reproduction in Education. Society and Culture. SAGE Publications, London and Beverly Hills. 9780803999954

[4] Cohausz L, Kappenberger J, Stuckenschmidt H (2024) What Fairness Metrics Can Really Tell You: A Case Study in the Educational Domain. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK ’24), pages 792–799. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636555.3636873

[5] DeJaeghere J, Dao V, Duong B-H, Luong P (2021) Inequalities in Learning in Vietnam: Teachers’ Beliefs About and Classroom Practices for Ethnic Minorities. RISE Working Paper 061, RISE Programme. https://riseprogramme.org/sites/default/files/2021-02/RISE_WP-061_DeJaeghere_etal.pdf

[6] Gardner J, Brooks C, Baker R (2019) Evaluating the Fairness of Predictive Student Models Through Slicing Analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK ’19), pages 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303791

[7] Glewwe P, Chen Q, Katare B (2015) What Determines Learning among Kinh and Ethnic Minority Students in Vietnam? Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 2(3):494–516. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.102

[8] Karimi A-H, Barthe G, Balle B, Schölkopf B, Valera I (2022) A Survey of Algorithmic Recourse: Contrastive Explanations and Consequential Recommendations. ACM Comput Surv 55(5):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3527848

[9] Karlidag-Dennis E, Hazenberg R, Dinh A-T (2020) Is Education for All? The Experiences of Ethnic Minority Students and Teachers in North-western Vietnam Engaging with Social Entrepreneurship. Int J Educ Dev 77:102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102224

[10] Khosravi H, Shum SB, Chen G, Conati C, Tsai Y-S, Kay J, Knight S, Martinez-Maldonado R, Sadiq S, Gašević D (2022) Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Education. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence 3:100074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100074

[11] Lundberg SM, Lee S-I (2017) A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07874

[12] Nguyen TV, Phung TN, Do DC (2024) Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Systematic Reviews of Artificial Intelligence in Education. In Advances in Information and Communication Technology, ICTA, (2023) Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, volume 848. Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50818-9_37

[13] Nguyen CD, Ha X (2023) ‘Even Studying Higher, We Just End up with Earning a Living by Picking Coffee Cherries’: Challenges to Educational Equity for Ethnic Minority Students in Vietnam. Comp Educ 53(6):967–985. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2021.1976622

[14] OECD. (2012). Equity in Education: Supporting Disadvantaged Students and Schools. OECD Publishing, Paris. ISBN 9789264130845. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264130852-en

[15] Pham N, Hung PN, Nguyen-Duc A (2025) Fairness for Machine Learning Software in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study. J Syst Softw 219:112244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.112244

[16] Phyo LW, Ilie S (2025) Toward 2030: Inequities in Higher Education Access in Southeast Asia. Social Sciences 14(10):592. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14100592

[17] Prinsloo P, Slade S (2017) An Elephant in the Learning Analytics Room: The Obligation to Act. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (LAK ’17), pages 46–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3027385.3027406

[18] Ribeiro MT, Singh S, Guestrin C (2016) “Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’16), pages 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778

[19] Selwyn N (2019) Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK. 9781509528967

[20] Sen A (1999) Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford. 9780198297581

[21] Slade S, Prinsloo P (2013) Learning Analytics: Ethical Issues and Dilemmas. Am Behav Sci 57(10):1510–1529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479366

[22] Tinto V (1993) Leaving College: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

[23] UNESCO. (2015) Education 2030: Equity and Quality with a Lifelong Learning Perspective. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233029

[24] UNESCO. (2020) Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education – All Means All. UNESCO Global Report, Paris. https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989

[25] Wachter S, Mittelstadt B, Russell C (2018) Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2):841–887. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.00399

[26] World Bank. (2020) Improving the Performance of Higher Education in Vietnam: Strategic Priorities and Policy Options. World Bank report. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/347431588175259657

[27] World Bank. (2020) Vietnam’s Human Capital: Education Success and Future Challenges (Vietnamese). World Bank report. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/487991596433786023

File PDF

Mở file PDF ↗ ↓ Tải PDF
← Quay lại danh sách bài báo