Scopus

Interface design for HCI classroom: from learners’ perspective

Năm XB 2020 Tạp chí / Hội thảo International Symposium on Visual Computing 545-557 DOI / Link https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64559-5_43 ↗

Tác giả

VT Nguyen

Tóm tắt

Having a good Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) design is challenging. Previous works have contributed significantly to fostering HCI, including design principle with report study from the instructor view. The questions of how and to what extent students perceive the design principles are still left open. To answer this question, this paper conducts a study of HCI adoption in the classroom. The studio-based learning method is adapted to teach 83 graduate and undergraduate students in 16 weeks long with four activities. A standalone presentation tool for instant online peer feedback during the presentation session is developed to help students justify and critique other’s work. Our tool provides a sandbox, which supports multiple application types, including Web-applications, Object Detection, Web-based Virtual Reality (VR), and Augmented Reality (AR). After presenting one assignment and two projects, our results shows that students acquired a better understanding of the Golden Rules principle over time, which is demonstrated by the development of visual interface design. The Wordcloud reveals the primary focus was on the user interface and sheds light on students’ interest in user experience. The inter-rater score indicates the agreement among students that they have the same level of understanding of the principles. The results show a high level of guideline compliance with HCI principles, in which we witness variations in visual cognitive styles. Regardless of diversity in visual preference, the students present high consistency and a similar perspective on adopting HCI design principles. The results also elicit suggestions into the development of the HCI curriculum in the future.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Aalberg, T., Lorås, M.: Active learning and student peer assessment in a web development course. In: Norsk IKT-konferanse for forskning og utdanning (2018)

[2] Albano, A.: Introduction to educational and psychological measurement using R (2017)

[3] Carter, A.S., Hundhausen, C.D.: A review of studio-based learning in computer science. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 27(1), 105–111 (2011)

[4] Churchill, E.F., Bowser, A., Preece, J.: Teaching and learning human-computer interaction: past, present, and future. Interactions 20(2), 44–53 (2013)

[5] Cicchetti, D.V.: Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol. Assess. 6(4), 284 (1994)

[6] Dang, T., Nguyen, H.N., Pham, V.: WordStream: interactive visualization for topic evolution. In: Johansson, J., Sadlo, F., Marai, G.E. (eds.) EuroVis 2019 - Short Papers. The Eurographics Association (2019). https://doi.org/10.2312/evs.20191178

[7] Dang, T., Pham, V., Nguyen, H.N., Nguyen, N.V.: AgasedViz: visualizing groundwater availability of Ogallala Aquifer, USA. Environ. Earth Sci. 79(5), 1–12 (2020)

[8] Figl, K., Bauer, C., Kriglstein, S.: Students’ view on instant online feedback for presentations. In: Proceedings of the AMCIS 2009, p. 775 (2009)

[9] Gehringer, E.F.: Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses. ACM SIGCSE Bull. 33(1), 139–143 (2001)

[10] Greenberg, S.: Teaching human computer interaction to programmers. Interactions 3(4), 62–76 (1996)

[11] Hatziapostolou, T., Paraskakis, I.: Enhancing the impact of formative feedback on student learning through an online feedback system. Electron. J. E-learn. 8(2), 111–122 (2010)

[12] Hewett, T.T., et al.: ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction. ACM, New York (1992)

[13] Interaction Design Foundation: What is Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)? (2019). https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/topics/human-computer-interaction. Accessed 1 July 2020

[14] Kulkarni, C.E., Bernstein, M.S., Klemmer, S.R.: PeerStudio: rapid peer feedback emphasizes revision and improves performance. In: Proceedings of the Second (2015) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 75–84 (2015)

[15] Le, D.D., Pham, V., Nguyen, H.N., Dang, T.: Visualization and explainable machine learning for efficient manufacturing and system operations. Smart Sustain. Manuf. Syst. 3(2), 127–147 (2019)

[16] Ma, X., Yu, L., Forlizzi, J.L., Dow, S.P.: Exiting the design studio: leveraging online participants for early-stage design feedback. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 676–685 (2015)

[17] Magrabi, F., Coiera, E.W., Westbrook, J.I., Gosling, A.S., Vickland, V.: General practitioners’ use of online evidence during consultations. Int. J. Med. Inf. 74(1), 1–12 (2005)

[18] McGraw, K.O., Wong, S.P.: Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol. Methods 1(1), 30 (1996)

[19] Nguyen, H.N., Dang, T.: EQSA: Earthquake situational analytics from social media. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST 2019), pp. 142–143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST47406.2019.8986947

[20] Nichols, T.R., Wisner, P.M., Cripe, G., Gulabchand, L.: Putting the kappa statistic to use. Qual. Assur. J. 13(3–4), 57–61 (2010)

[21] Shannon, A., Hammer, J., Thurston, H., Diehl, N., Dow, S.: PeerPresents: A wab-based system for in-class peer feedback during student presentations. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, DIS 2016, pp. 447–458. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901816

[22] Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., Diakopoulos, N.: Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Pearson, London (2016)

[23] Sims, R.: Interactivity: a forgotten art? Comput. Hum. Behav. 13(2), 157–180 (1997)

[24] Nguyen, V.T., Hite, R., Dang, T.: Web-based virtual reality development in classroom: from learner’s perspectives. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR 2018), pp. 11–18 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR.2018.00010

← Quay lại danh sách bài báo