Scopus

A Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis of Systematic Reviews of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Năm XB 2024 Tạp chí / Hội thảo Advances in Information and Communication Technology (ICTA 2023) 337-351 Đơn vị CNTT DOI / Link https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50818-9_37 ↗

Tác giả

Vinh Nguyen The ^✉ ; Cuong Do Dinh ; Trung-Nghia Phung

Tóm tắt

This study presented a bibliometric and thematic analysis of systematic reviews of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, selecting relevant papers using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The VOSviewer software was utilized to analyze 44 papers in order to identify trends, patterns, and keyword clusters. China and Hong Kong were the most prolific countries publishing review papers between 2019 and 2023. Our result revealed that Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence is the prominent outlet for research in this field. This study’s eight keyword clusters provided a comprehensive overview of the various aspects and applications of AI in education, including AI education and teaching, AI implementation in health and education fields, conversational AI and language models, education and learning analytics for sustainable development, AI algorithms and intelligent tutoring systems in higher education, emerging technologies in distance and virtual education, and digital health and ethics. Our results can inform policymakers, educators, and researchers about the potential of AI to improve the teaching and learning processes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

[1] Aguilar-Esteva, V., Acosta-Banda, A., Carreño Aguilera, R., Patiño Ortiz, M.: Sustainable social development through the use of artificial intelligence and data science in education during the covid emergency: A systematic review using prisma. Sustainability 15(8), 6498 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086498

[2] Akgun, S., Greenhow, C.: Artificial intelligence in education: addressing ethical challenges in k-12 settings. AI Ethics 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7

[3] Arya, S., Kaji, A.H., Boermeester, M.A.: Prisma reporting guidelines for meta-analyses and systematic reviews. JAMA Surg. 156(8), 789–790 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0546

[4] Chuyen, N.T.H., et al.: An empirical analysis of predictors of AI-powered design tool adoption. TEM J. 12(3), 1482 (2023). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM123-28

[5] Dimitriadou, E., Lanitis, A.: A critical evaluation, challenges, and future perspectives of using artificial intelligence and emerging technologies in smart classrooms. Smart Learn. Environ. 10(1), 1–26 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00231-3

[6] Garlinska, M., Osial, M., Proniewska, K., Pregowska, A.: The influence of emerging technologies on distance education. Electronics 12(7), 1550 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12071550

[7] Laupichler, M.C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., Raupach, T.: Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: a scoping literature review. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 100101 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101

[8] Rangel-de Lázaro, G., Duart, J.M.: You can handle, you can teach it: systematic review on the use of extended reality and artificial intelligence technologies for online higher education. Sustainability 15(4), 3507 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043507

[9] Lo, C.K.: What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Educ. Sci. 13(4), 410 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

[10] Nguyen, V., Nguyen, C.: The effect of structural equation modeling on chatbot usage: an investigation of dialogflow. IJAIT (Int. J. Appl. Inf. Technol.) 38–49 (2023). https://doi.org/10.25124/ijait.v6i01.4840

[11] Nguyen, V.T., Jung, K., Gupta, V.: Examining data visualization pitfalls in scientific publications. Vis. Comput. Ind., Biomed., Art 4(1), 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-021-00092-y

[12] Nguyen, V.T., Lai, H.T., Ha, Q.V.: Factors affecting the readiness of digital transformation adopters: a case study in Vietnam. Int. Res. J. Sci., Technol., Educ., Manag. (IRJSTEM) 3(1) (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7772821

[13] Nguyen, V.T., Nguyen, C.T., Yoo, S.C., Jung, K.: Unveiling augmented reality applications: exploring influential factors through comprehensive review. SN Comput. Sci. 4(5), 694 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02175-4

[14] Nguyen, V.T., Nguyen, C.T.: A systematic review of structural equation modeling in augmented reality applications. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 328–338 (2022). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v28.i1.pp328-338

[15] Ray, P.P.: ChatGPT: a comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Int. Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

[16] Salas-Pilco, S.Z., Xiao, K., Hu, X.: Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: a systematic review. Educ. Sci. 12(8), 569 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569

[17] Salas-Pilco, S.Z., Yang, Y.: Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 19(1), 1–20 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00326-w

[18] Sallam, M.: ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. In: Healthcare, vol. 11, p. 887. MDPI (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887

[19] Su, J., Ng, D.T.K., Chu, S.K.W.: Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in early childhood education: The challenges and opportunities. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 4, 100124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124

[20] Su, J., Yang, W.: Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: a scoping review. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 3, 100049 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049

[21] Su, J., Zhong, Y., Ng, D.T.K.: A meta-review of literature on educational approaches for teaching AI at the k-12 levels in the Asia-pacific region. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 3, 100065 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100065

[22] Tahiru, F.: AI in education: a systematic literature review. J. Cases Inf. Technol. (JCIT) 23(1), 1–20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.4018/JCIT.2021010101

[23] Thurzo, A., Strunga, M., Urban, R., Surovková, J., Afrashtehfar, K.I.: Impact of artificial intelligence on dental education: a review and guide for curriculum update. Educ. Sci. 13(2), 150 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13020150

[24] Van Eck, N., Waltman, L.: Software survey: Vosviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84(2), 523–538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

[25] Weng, X., Chiu, T.K.: Instructional design and learning outcomes of intelligent computer assisted language learning: systematic review in the field. Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell. 100117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100117

[26] Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., Gouverneur, F.: Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators? Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 16(1), 1–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

[27] Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C.S., Jong, M.S.Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., Liu, J.B., Yuan, J., Li, Y.: A review of artificial intelligence (AI) in education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity 2021, 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542

Ghi chú

ICTA

← Quay lại danh sách bài báo